By Justin Yamashita, MSc. Benchtop, site, CRO: three levels of basic and clinical research, explained without spin.
From Open Label Media, the team behind Root to Rx, come two free tools for telling what's true. Got Skepticism? runs any claim through a five-move toolkit to test whether your confidence is earned, and Stay in the Room shows you how to disagree without a fight. Both play in your browser in about two minutes at openlabelmedia.com.
The Root to Rx Lab Facebook group had been quiet since Nani's last line. The enrollment arc was done. Debby had made her commitment public. Vera was in month 6 of her trial.
A week passed. Then Debby's phone buzzed.
The Message
Her cousin sent her a link. The message with it was three sentences long.
“You know that newsletter you keep posting about? The one that says vaccines are safe? Did you know Pfizer was fined billions for fraud? Big Pharma literally admitted they lie. Here's the actual story.”
The link went to a health-freedom blog that Debby recognized. She had shared something from it 3 months ago. She was almost certain of that.
3 months ago, she would have hit forward before she finished reading.
Today, she didn’t forward it. She opened a browser tab and started running the questions from the toolkit.
What She Found with the Skeptic’s Toolkit
Q4 first. Who made this claim, and what do they gain if she believes it?
The blog sold supplements. The sidebar had three banner ads for immune-support products. The author's bio linked to an affiliate store. That did not make the claim false. It meant the source had a financial stake in the claim being believed.
She kept going. The Pfizer fine was real. In 2009, Pfizer paid $2.3 billion to settle criminal and civil charges related to the illegal marketing of several drugs, including Bextra. The charges included promoting drugs for off-label uses and paying kickbacks to physicians.
The blog's framing was: Pfizer admitted they lied, therefore vaccines cannot be trusted.
Debby stared at that for a while.
So she ran Q5 to expand on her research. Am I applying the same standard to all claims? A marketing fraud settlement does not change what the clinical trial data for a vaccine shows. The people who ran the Bextra campaign and the people who ran the vaccine trials are not the same people. The regulatory review of the vaccine was not conducted by Pfizer.
She ran Q9. What do independent experts with no stake in the outcome say? The vaccine safety record includes FDA review, independent advisory committees, and post-market surveillance across hundreds of millions of doses.
She typed a reply to her cousin. She deleted it twice. The third version was shorter than the first two.
What She Sent Back
Debby typed, “The Pfizer fine is real, I looked it up myself. It was for marketing fraud on a painkiller, not vaccines. I know this sounds like I am defending them, but I’m not. I just looked at what the fine was actually for before I shared it. Here’s the link to the DOJ document if you want to read it yourself.”
She didn’t send a lecture. She didn’t send 11 issues of a newsletter. She sent one link to a primary source and told her cousin what she had done.
She posted in the Lab that evening.
Debby: Someone sent me a 'pharma admitted they lie' post. I almost forwarded it. The fine it was based on is real. The conclusion it drew from the fine is not. I ran the questions. It took 12 minutes.
Sam: That is the Skeptic's posture. You held the criticism and the context at the same time. 2 truths held, for one full picture. This is how we all take responsibility for stemming the flow of misinformation.
Debby took a line out of the STARVE playbook. Will you?
WORTH REPEATING · THE LINE
I almost forwarded it. Instead I ran the questions. It took 12 minutes.
A Voice in the Background
Later in the thread, someone Debby didn’t recognize posted a link to a health influencer's recent video. The influencer had 2.4 million followers. The title was: 'The Real Reason Doctors Don't Tell You About This.'
Nobody in the Lab clicked it. But everyone saw it.
Sam added a note to the post: 'Q4 before you click. Always Q4 before you click.'
The influencer's name in the thumbnail was Dr. X. Anecdote.
If you recall, we’ve met a Dr. Anecdote before. And Rooty the Researcher and Sam the Skeptic helped give Debby the tools to become skeptical.
A newer member replied under Debby's post.
Member: Where do I get the questions she keeps talking about?
Sam: Free in the Field Guide. Keep them on your phone. The next 'they admitted they lie' post is already on its way, and 12 minutes beats a year of regret.
Next Week in The Root Room
The Root Room moves to a pharmacy. Debby walks in with a bag she bought online. A pharmacist named Lynn, PharmD is behind the counter. Dr. X. Anecdote is in the supplement aisle.
ABOUT OPEN LABEL MEDIA
Root to Rx is part of Open Label Media LLC. Open label is a clinical trial term for a study that hides nothing: no blinding, no hidden group, no sleight of hand. That is the whole point of what we build. Open Label Media exists for evidence literacy, in the open, with no agenda. Root to Rx points that openness at the clinical research world, which is much bigger than the drug companies: the sites, doctors, coordinators, nurses, CROs, scientists, biostatisticians, and regulators who actually run it. You will meet them in the issues ahead.
The views expressed on Root to Rx are my own and do not represent the views or positions of my employer, or any affiliated organization.
Root to Rx | 228 Park Ave S, #29976, New York, New York 10003, United States
You are receiving this because you subscribed at roottorx.com.